Why do you think the subject of organizational behaviour might be criticized as being “only common sense” when one would rarely hear such a criticism of a course in physics or statistics? Discuss (at least five pages)
In attempting to discuss the above posed question one has to understand why the field of organization behaviour exists and its importance. Since people tend to think that moral, ethics, common sense, religion, can help managers to manage individuals in an organization.
Different ways of looking at the world produce different knowledge and thus different perspectives come to be associated with their own concepts and theories. This is the case of our question in hand. The concepts and theories of a particular perspective offer you distinctive thinking tools with which to craft ideas. Depending upon your intentions, you may find that particular perspectives have greater appeal than others for your purpose. The more knowledge you have of perspectives, concepts and theories, the greater will be your capacity to choose a useful approach to dealing with the situations you face in your working environment. But why study organizational behaviour? Suppose you are an investment analyst trying to evaluate the long-term profitability of a company. What are some of the observable factors you might consider in making a judgment…may be you will consider financial strength, quality of its products, market dominance, technology, and management; all of these are important, but they are mostly about the present. Just because technology is good today doesn't mean it will always be good. There are a lot of makers of vacuum tubes that can attest to that. Financial strength is basically a measure of the company's past success. What determines whether the company will continue to develop sought-after products, will continue to develop cutting edge technology, will continue to make the right guesses about which way the market is going to go, will continue to make sound investments, is the people and the organizational culture and structure. When an individual first get a job, it is usually because of his/her technical skills. For example, if a person get a job as an artist, physicist etc, it's because he/she can paint (or sculpt or whatever). Now, some people stay in technical positions all their lives. But others move on to manage people. Their technical skills don't matter as much anymore (especially since technology keeps changing). What does matter is their ability to manage people. And that's what organizational behaviour is about. Another important aspect of organizational behaviour is the understanding that it gives you of organizational structure and process. Understanding how organizations really work is a key to rising to the top levels of management. Most people who work in organizations come to understand the politics and issues in their own departments. But they don't get much opportunity (and often don't even think about) what happens in the rest of the organization. People trained in organizational behavior have the jump on those people, because they already understand a great deal about what makes organizations tick. Hence, their presentations, their political moves, their organizational initiatives are all in better tune with the organization as a whole, and are more apt to be admired by people higher in the organization... Many scholars have defined organizational behaviour in different ways and here are some of those definitions:
(LM Prasad). Organizational behaviour “is the study and application of knowledge about human behaviour related to other elements of an organization such as structure, technology and social systems
(Stephen P Robins) “Organizational behaviour is a systematic study of the actions and attitudes that people exhibit within organizations.”
(Gregory Morehead and Ricky W. Griffin) Organization behaviour is the study of human behaviour in the workplace, of...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document