What are the advantages and disadvantages of a multi-perspective approach to understanding organizations? In answering the question you will need to engage with the nature of the various perspectives and how they enable and limit our understanding of organizations.
You may argue that one of the advantages of using a multiple perspective approach is a wider understanding of organization culture; you may support this argument by drawing on the different theories of culture from 2 or 3 different perspectives.
The organization is very complex. We can look it in four different perspectives; modernism, critical theory, symbolic interpretivism and postmodernism. They have advantages and disadvantages to understanding organizations. After much consideration, I feel that modernism is the best perspective to understanding organization compared to the rest. The main argument for this perspective is more practical and it is more similar and relates to the organizations in Singapore. The organizations in Singapore have been constantly changing to the perspective modernism. Modernist thinks that organizations are the social tool and they can adapt to changes internally and externally.
Firstly, the ontology theory of the modernism is regarding a belief in an external reality that is based on knowledge. It produced evidences, sciences and reasons to show that the belief is true and it will be the best solution. It was intrinsically optimistic as people are more motivated and confident when they shown indisputable evidence and concrete reasoning or facts to support certain beliefs. This is very practical, as the workers in the organization will start to research mainly on articles, books and other materials in order to strengthen their knowledge to bring up better work in their organization. Furthermore, effective knowledge management is also important in achieving an organization goals and objectives as new innovations can be done to...
References: Burrell, G. 1988. Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis 2: The contribution of Michael Foucault. Organization Studies, 9(2): 221-335
Please join StudyMode to read the full document