Privatization in Energy Sector of Pakistan

Topics: Transaction cost, Electricity generation, Government Pages: 20 (6245 words) Published: June 25, 2013
Abstract:
The electric power sector in Pakistan is growing faster. However, the demand in Pakistan is growing even faster than the supply and therefore power shortage has become a serious problem. The problem is compounded by inefficiency of electric power sector. Moreover there is underpricing, subsidizing, overstaffing and inadequate maintenance. Like many other developing countries, Pakistan has also opted for "privatization" in the form of transfer of ownership as the first best solution. However, a wide range of literature argues that such type of privatization in the case of electric power may not lead to miracles. The present article attempts to identify causes of implementation and failure of Privatization Reforms in power sector of Pakistan. We will try to find out tentative answers from Institutional and Transaction cost theory of management of their reasons of implementation and failure. It is noted that the privatization of electric power sector in Pakistan, as pursued now, may not resolve the problems of this sector. It may ease short-run financial constraints but it may also create a number of long-term problems such as inappropriate planning, greater energy dependence and insecurity. It is also noted that current problems stem primarily from institutional and organizational constraints faced by public sector power enterprises. The key issue may not be a choice between public or private ownership but to determine an appropriate reform package based on either public/private or a mixed ownership structure that encourages greater private involvement and functions well in the specific environment of Pakistan.

Introduction:
Like many other developing countries, Pakistan announced a policy shift towards the private sector in early 1980s which was later enhanced by the structural adjustment program under the supervision of the IMF and the World Bank. Consequently, private sector investment increased from 26 percent to 51 percent of total investment during 1978-88. However, most of the privatized companies were in manufacturing industry. Privatization in the banking, electricity, telecommunications and transport sectors was delayed because of lack of procedural clarity, fear of unemployment among workers and the consequential emergence of private monopolies resulting in increase in prices. Recently, Pakistan has expanded the scope of its privatization program to include infrastructure also with electric power sector at the top of the agenda. The policy objective is to improve efficiency by establishing a healthy and competitive infrastructure sector. Privatization of electric power sector expected to spur economic growth and reduce fiscal deficits. But there are contrary opinions. It has been argued in a number of studies that privatization of electric power may not lead to miracles. Even though it may ease short run financial constraints, but it may also create a number of long-term problems such as inappropriate planning and greater energy dependence and insecurity. Even short-run financial benefits may be costly if the sector is not properly regulated and supervised. Therefore, the key issue may not be a choice between public and private ownership, but to determine an appropriate and suitable reform (either public or private or a mixed public-private structure) which could work better in the specific environment of Pakistan. This article argues that the privatization of electric power in Pakistan, as pursued now, may not resolve the problems of this sector. Tentative answers will be tried to find out from management theories (Institutional + Transaction Cost).

“ELECTRIC POWER SECTOR IN PAKISTAN AND PRIVATIZATION REFORMS” The public sector is usually composed of organizations that are owned and operated by the government. This includes federal, provincial, state, or municipal governments, depending on where you live. Privacy legislation usually calls organizations in the public sector a public body or...

References: DiMaggio, P. J., & PowellSource, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977, September). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 97-112.
Scott, & Davis. (2007). Organizations and Organizing: Rational,Natural and Open Systems Perspectives.
Scott, W. R. (1987). The Adolescence of Institutional Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 493-511.
Jongwook Kim, & Joseph T. Mahoney. (2005). Property Rights Theory, Transaction Costs Theory, and Agency Theory: An Organizational Economics Approach to Strategic Management. Managerial And Decision Economics, 223–242.
Ouchi, W. G. (March 1980). Markets, Bureaucracies,and Clans. Admnistrative Science Quarterly, 25, 121-141.
Robins, J. A. (1987). Organizational Economics: Notes on the Use of Transaction-Cost Theory in the Study of Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 68-86.
Scott, & Davis. (2007). Organizations and Organizing: Rational,Natural and Open Systems Perspectives.
Simon, H. A. (Spring 1991). Organizations and Markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(2), 25-44.
William S. Hesterly, Julia Liebeskind, & Todd R. Zen. (1990). Organizational Economics: An Impending Revolution in Organization Theory? The Academy of Management Review, 15(3), 402-420.
Ghafoor, A. and J. Weiss (1999) Privatisation of Electric Power Sector in Pakistan: Some Important Issues . The Pakistan Development Review 38:1, 69–84.
Ghani, M. O. (2009) Pakistan’s Energy Sector Needs Long-term Sustainable Policy.Business and Finance Review, February 23.
Khan, A. F. (2011) The DAWN, September 27.
Khan, A. H. (2011) Power Sector Crisis: Some Recommendations. The News, May24.
Khan, M. Z. (2011) Plan to Raise Power Tariff, Cut Subsidies. The DAWN , July 22.
Kiani, K. (2008) Energy Crisis: Serious and Worsening. The DAWN, January 07.
Kiani, K. (2011) 15 Percent Raise in Power Tariffs on the Card. The DAWN, May06.
Kiani, K. (2011) Failure of Electricity Governance. The DAWN , February 21.
Kiani, K. (2011) Government to Ban New Oil Based Power Units. The DAWN,March 31.
Kiani, K. (2011) Minister Orders Mass Disconnection. The DAWN, September 22.
Kiani, K. (2011) Non-stop Power Supply for High Tariff Proposed. The DAWN, May16.
Malik, A. (2007) Effectiveness of Regulatory Structure in the Power Sector of Pakistan. Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad. (PIDE)
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Privatization Essay
  • Energy Sector of Pakistan Essay
  • Energy Sector Research Paper
  • Privatization Essay
  • Privatization Program in Pakistan Essay
  • History of Privatization in Pakistan Essay
  • privatization Essay
  • Essay on Privatization vs Public Sector

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free