Self-Assessment for Development as Manager

Topics: Organizational studies and human resource management, Organizational studies, Culture Pages: 12 (3320 words) Published: July 25, 2011
Self-assessment for development as manager


Self-Assessment for development as Manager

Self-assessment for development as manager


It is necessary for individuals to view themselves from the outside in occasionally in order to gain a different perspective and improve their self-evaluation ability. Furthermore, continual self-assessments enable leaders to understand their strengths and weaknesses so that they may improve on their leadership success (Banutu-Gomez and Rohrer 2011).

This paper explores the effectiveness of self-assessment exercises as a tool to increase my self-awareness on the complexities associated with leadership. In order to ascertain if I have the necessary values to be an effective leader, 19 selfassessment exercises from the McGraw-Hill website (McShane, Travaglione, and Olekalns 2010b) were completed for evaluation, 6 of which are selected for discussion in the first section.

The subsequent section examines my area of research which is cultural impact to leadership and why I consider it to be one of the most important organisational behaviour concepts that all future leaders should be perceptive of in today’s evermore multi-cultural society. I then examine the effectiveness and limitations of self-assessment exercises by linking it to my own insights and what I’ve learnt from the research. Finally, a brief conclusion is made on the suitability of selfassessment exercises to my personal and professional development.

I selected the need-strength questionnaire and reaffirmed myself as a person with a high level of need for achievement. I have been taught to engage in self leadership at a young age by evaluating my needs to set personal goals and visualising the steps to accomplish it.

Self-assessment for development as manager


One of my lifetime personal goals is to develop my awareness and openness to different national and organisational cultures by participating in many social and corporate events. I believe that to be an effective leader, you need to understand your followers in order to be appreciated and respected by them. I was surprised to find out in the same test that my score on the need for social approval was below average, that my need for affiliation was poor.

The other individual assessment that interested me was the equity preference test. I found out that I am in the extreme end of the “benevolent” group, scoring 79 out of 1-80 range. I came to understand that this can have a negative impact to the organisation. If a leader is too tolerant in situations where they are under rewarded, this would generate negative emotions from followers as they will inherently be forced to accept under-rewarded inequity as the prevailing organisational culture. I recall hearing regular remarks by my boss to stop my habits of working till late at night and during holidays. Although I am fine working overtime without compensation, I realised that some of my colleagues reacted negatively when they are pressured to follow suit.

I often work in teams and found that the success of a project is dependent on the level of collaboration between its members. To measure my proficiency and inclination for team work, I completed the team work preference and active listening self-assessment exercises. According to the results, I do have a strong preference for team work. However, my accumulated scores in the active listening exercise are below average.

Self-assessment for development as manager


I was not surprised to find out that I am quick to form judgement and instinctively respond to the speaker without hesitant. I learnt that even if I showed interest, I may not have evaluated the conversation issue accurately by forming hasty opinions. This may also affect my team member’s confidence to bring up a sensitive subject with me as a result of my frequent premature interruptions.

Being a consulting engineer, I am often seconded...

References: Banutu-Gomez, M., and W. Rohrer. 2011. Teams in organization. The Business Review, Cambridge 18 (1): 54. ProQuest. (accessed June 19, 2011). Detert, J. R., R. G. Schroeder, and J. J. Mauriel. 2000. A framework for linking culture and improvement initiatives in organizations. Academy of Management Review 25 (4): 850-863. Business Source Complete. (accessed June 19, 2011). Dunning, D., C. Heath, and J. M. Suls. 2004. Flawed self-assessment. Psychological Science in the Public Interest (Wiley-Blackwell) 5 (3): 69-106. bth. (accessed June 25, 2011). Ellis, M. 1998. Self-assessment: Knowing yourself and what you want to do! Black Collegian 29 (1): 36. ProQuest. (accessed June 26, 2011). Gregory, B. T., S. G. Harris, A. A. Armenakis, and C. L. Shook. 2009. Organizational culture and effectiveness: A study of values, attitudes, and organizational outcomes. Journal of Business Research 62 (7): 673-679. Science Direct. (accessed June 23, 2011). Hofstede, G. H. 1980. Culture 's consequences : International differences in workrelated values. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications. Kwantes, C. T., and C. A. Boglarsky. 2007. Perceptions of organizational culture, leadership effectiveness and personal effectiveness across six countries. Journal of International Management 13 (2): 204-230. Science Direct. (accessed June 23, 2011). Lynham, S. A., and T. J. Chermack. 2006. Responsible leadership for performance: A theoretical model and hypotheses. Journal of Leadership
Self-assessment for development as manager
& Organizational Studies 12 (4): 73-88. (accessed June 16, 2011). Magala, S. 2009. Crosscultural life of social values and organizational analysis: An introduction to the special themed section. Organization Studies 30 (9): 925-931. Sage. (accessed June 23, 2011). McShane, S. L., A. Travaglione, and M. Olekalns. 2010a. Organisational behaviour on the pacific rim. 3rd edition. ed. North Ryde, N.S.W.: McGrawHill. McShane, S. L., A. Travaglione, and M. Olekalns. 2010b. Organisational behaviour on the pacific rim: Self assessment exercises. (accessed June 18, 2011). McSweeney, B. 2002. Hofstede 's model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith - a failure of analysis. Human Relations 55 (1): 89. ProQuest. (accessed June 24, 2011). Migliore, L. A. 2011. Relation between big five personality traits and hofstede 's cultural dimensions: Samples from the USA and india. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal 18 (1): 38-54. Emerald. (accessed June 12, 2011). Minkov, M., and G. Hofstede. 2011. The evolution of hofstede 's doctrine. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal 18 (1): 10-20. Emerald June 23, 2011). Munley, A. E. 2011. Culture differences in leadership. IUP Journal of Soft Skills 5 (1): 16-30. Business Source Complete. (accessed June 12, 2011). Porter, L. W., and G. B. McLaughlin. 2006. Leadership and the organizational context: Like the weather? The Leadership Quarterly 17 (6): 559-576. Science Direct. (accessed June 23, 2011). Savage-Austin, A. P., and A. D. Honeycutt. 2011. Servant leadership: A phenomenological study of practices, experiences, organizational effectiveness, and barriers. Journal of Business & Economics Research 9 (1): 49. ProQuest. (accessed June 19, 2011). Schein, E. H. 1985. Organizational culture and leadership. San Franciso: JosseyBass Publishers. Shao, L., and S. Webber. 2006. A cross-cultural test of the five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership '. Journal of Business Research 59 (8): 936-944. Science Direct. (accessed June 23, 2011). Smith, P. B., M. F. Peterson, and S. H. Schwartz. 2002. Cultural values, sources of guidance, and their relevance to managerial behavior: A 47-nation study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 33 (2): 188-208. Sage. (accessed June 25, 2011). Solansky, S. T. 2008. Leadership style and team processes in self-managed teams. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 14 (4): 332-341.
Self-assessment for development as manager
Sage Journals Online (accessed June 18, 2011). Tall poppy syndrome. 2011. (accessed June 27, 2011). Visagie, J., and H. Linde. 2011. Employees ' perception of organisational culture in a multi-national construction company. The Business Review, Cambridge 18 (1): 61. ProQuest. (accessed June 19, 2011).
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • self development Essay
  • Essay about self assessment
  • Self Assessment Essay
  • Self Assessment Essay
  • Assessment and Development Essay
  • How to Perform a Self Assessment Essay
  • Self Assessment Essay
  • Essay on Self Assessment

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free